Most common form for Natural Rough Diamond is
octahedron, a form with 8 similar and equilateral triangle faces, each meeting
the three crystallographic axes (a, b & c) at equal distance. Any colorless
or near colorless stone of octahedron form with good luster is perfect enough
to deceive.
Such spurious diamonds, which are not actually
diamond but are rather some other natural or synthetic stone, are getting
frequent to encounter.
IGI-GTL, Delhi received one
such Diamond mimicking Tinted White 10.31ct Synthetic Moissanite, measuring
12.29 x 10.10 x 11.61 mm, for routine testing.
![]() |
Synthetic Moissanite, fashioned like a Octahedron form |
With unaided eyes, 2 opposite faces of the crystal were observed fully
covered with irregular depressions, resembling it to the surface of some
natural rough crystal with growth markings. Closer examination under high
magnification revealed those irregular depressions as sub-hexagonal
depressions, probably formed due to etching, resembling to basal plane
dislocations found on as grown synthetic Moissanite crystals. On these
depressions, sharp random pits were also observed.
![]() |
sub-hexagonal depressions, note irregular sharp pits present between depressions |
![]() |
Sub-hexagonal depressions on face of Synthetic Moissanite, covering whole face |
Other faces of the stone were not densely covered with depressions or
markings, rather were carrying random holes, which were found to be conical
under high magnification.
![]() |
Random conical holes |
These conical pits were penetrating through the
stone from one face to another, forming pipes or tubes perpendicular to C axis,
with both endings of conical shape.
![]() |
Conical tubes forming pipes or tubes from one face to other |
Silicon droplets were also observed over the
tubes, suggesting that those droplets were trapped while the formation of tubes
only, or may be formation of tubes are somewhere the result of these droplets
formation.
![]() |
Silicon droplets over the tubes, circled red |
Cluster of black material was also noticed under magnification, which
was probably carbon inclusion. Several deliberate scratches were present on the
stones surface, which shows that destructive test of hardness check has been
applied on the stone in a crude way, during the attempt to identify or confirm
its identity as diamond.
![]() |
Carbon inclusion |
Deliberate scratches on stone's face |
Stone showed Doubly Refractive nature under the
crossed polars (polariscope), SG was recorded as 3.21, and IR spectrum along
with magnification features stone identity was confirmed as Synthetic
Moissanite.
Comments and suggestions are welcome.
(All photographs are taken by the author.)
Author:
Meenakshi Chauhan
Indian Gemological Institute - Gem Testing Laboratory (IGI-GTL),
Jhandewalan, Delhi
(Project of GJEPC)
References:
Physical Vapor Transport (PVT) Growth (with
focus on SiC and brief review on AlN & GaN) by Peter J. Wellmann, Crystal
Growth Lab, Materials Department 6, University of Erlangen,G ermany,
peter.wellmann@ww.uni-erlangen.de
Lab Information Circular, GTL, Jaipur, Vol. 76,
July 2018
G&G, 2017 Winter, page 462, SYNTHETIC
MOISSANITE, Imitating Rough Diamond